Skip to content

Menu

ChannelsPublishersSubscribe
LexBlog, Inc. logo
LexBlog, Inc. logo
ProductsSub-MenuBlogsPortalsTwentySyndicationMicrositesResource Center
Join
Search
Close
Join the Movement. Blog 4 Good

Insurance Agents did not Qualify as “Franchises” Under the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act

By Adam J. Siegelheim on July 8, 2014
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn

The New Jersey Appellate Division recently held that insurance agents were not considered “franchises” under the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act (Mario DeLuca v. Allstate New Jersey Insurance Company (Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division No. A-2724-11T4 (2014)).   

The Plaintiff insurance agents were independent insurance agents for Allstate. The court noted that “relationship between Allstate and plaintiffs did not constitute a franchise under the Act because there was no “community of interest” and plaintiffs did not maintain a “place of business” as those terms are used under the Act.”  

Under the Act, a franchisee must maintain a fixed geographical location to offer or sell the franchisor’s goods or services in order to establish a “place of business” under the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act (the “NJFPA”). In concluding that the plaintiff’s did not maintain a “place of business,” the court reasoned that the plaintiffs were merely agents and not insurers, authorized to sell insurance in the State of New Jersey. Since the plaintiff agents were not permitted to sell the insurance product themselves, they could not meet the “place of business” requirement under the NJFPA.

Photo of Adam J. Siegelheim Adam J. Siegelheim

Adam J. Siegelheim is a Shareholder and member of the Business & Corporate and Franchise Groups. Mr. Siegelheim’s practice includes the representation of companies and non-profit organizations on a variety of issues including entity formation, financing, intellectual property, real estate, mergers and acquisitions…

Adam J. Siegelheim is a Shareholder and member of the Business & Corporate and Franchise Groups. Mr. Siegelheim’s practice includes the representation of companies and non-profit organizations on a variety of issues including entity formation, financing, intellectual property, real estate, mergers and acquisitions, and insurance coverage matters.

Read more about Adam J. SiegelheimEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Civil Litigation
  • Blog:
    New Jersey Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Stark & Stark
  • Article: View Original Source

Stay Connected

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers

Company

  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service

Products

  • Products
  • Blogs
  • Portals
  • Twenty
  • Syndication
  • Microsites

Support

  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • California Employment Law
  • Privacy Compliance & Data Security
  • Startup GC Business Law Insights
  • New York Surrogate's Court Monitor
  • NC Legal Landscapes
Copyright © 2021, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered By LexBlog