Insurers as Victims of Fraud
In State v. Cross, No. E2001-02724-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. 08/12/2002), the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals was faced with a defendant who claimed that an insurer, for purposes of criminal restitution, could not be the victim of a crime. The basis of the conclusion was that the insurer’s obligations to pay were contractual and not as a result of the direct acts of the criminal against the victim.
The following video was adapted from my book, “Insurance Claims A Comprehensive Guide” Published by the National Underwriter Company and is available at the Zalma Insurance Claims Library
The author and publisher disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this blog. The information provided is not a substitute for the advice of a competent insurance, legal, or other professional. The Information provided at this site should not be relied on as legal advice. Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to an individual situation.