Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Taking a byte at financial crime: New AML/CTF guidance and timelines for digital currency exchanges

By Ivan Yau (AU), Angus Jamieson (AU) & Jon Ireland on April 16, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Australia’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) regulator, AUSTRAC, has released its guidance with respect to new laws that require digital currency exchange (DCE) providers to register and comply with AML/CTF obligations.

AUSTRAC takes a broad approach in interpreting what is covered within the legal definition of a DCE. Essentially, any operation that converts fiat currency (such as the Australian dollar or equivalent) into any digital currency, or vice versa, will be considered by AUSTRAC as a DCE.

Because the AML/CTF regime adopts a risk-based approach, when conducting their Money Laundering / Terrorism Financing (ML/TF) risk assessments and developing their AML/CTF Programs, DCE providers should take into account risk factors associated with operating in the “digital world”.  For example, DCE transactions involving proxies, unverifiable IP addresses, disposable email addresses, blacklisted addresses (such as those on the “darknet”), ransom-ware, anonymous digital currencies and ever changing devices are just some of the risk indicators that AUSTRAC has identified.

In addition to the requirement of enrolling and registering with AUSTRAC, DCE providers need to take all reasonable steps to mitigate against these ML/TF risks and to comply with AML/CTF obligations that include conducting customer due diligence (know your customer), staff training, employee due diligence, suspicious matter reporting, reporting of transactions involving $10,000 (Australian dollar or equivalent) or more in physical cash and keeping records.

Although the new AML/CTF regime covering DCE providers commenced on 3 April 2018, AUSTRAC has announced the following transitional arrangements to allow more time for registrable DCE providers to achieve compliance:

  • DCE providers already enrolled with AUSTRAC before 3 April 2018 (for example, they provide other designated services regulated under the AML/CTF Act) will need to update their enrolment details by 11 June 2018;
  • DCE providers not already enrolled with AUSTRAC but who have provided DCE services before 3 April 2018, or start to provide DCE services between 3 April 2018 and 14 May 2018, will need to register with AUSTRAC by 14 May 2018; and
  • DCE providers intending to provide DCE services on or after 15 May 2018 will need to register with AUSTRAC before they provide these services.

During the transitional periods, a DCE provider can continue to provide services while its registration application is being assessed by AUSTRAC. However, it is a criminal offence to provide, and civil penalty consequences apply for providing, DCE services while unregistered after 14 May 2018, unless exemption has been granted by AUSTRAC.

AUSTRAC’s guidance with respect to DCE providers can be found here.

Photo of Ivan Yau (AU) Ivan Yau (AU)
Email
Photo of Jon Ireland Jon Ireland
Read more about Jon IrelandEmail
  • Posted in:
    Financial, International
  • Blog:
    Financial services: Regulation tomorrow
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • LEX Reception Blog
  • Civil Justice Blog
  • Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Stridon News and Insights
  • Taft Class Action & Consumer Insights
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo