While President Trump regularly shatters political norms, and playing to his base rather than appealing to a broader electorate seems to fit his unorthodox style, he in fact is not that different from his predecessors in remaining loyal to his core supporters.

In yesterday’s N.Y. Times, columnist Jamelle Bouie encouraged Trump to “embrace the more moderate approach he promised as a candidate,” and it is commonly thought that Presidents do moderate their agendas once they take office. But as Prof. B. Dan Wood found in his study of presidential behavior, modern Presidents generally have maintained the partisan views that secured their nomination and have not made significant moves to attract the other party’s voters. A strategy of reinforcing core support by tailoring policies to the political base and persuading enough independents to move in the President’s direction is usually more successful than moderating policies and risking alienation of the base. This is especially the case when voters are highly polarized in their party affiliations as they are today in the United States.

We would be better off if Presidents took their lead from George Washington, who said that “I have sought the happiness of my fellow citizens” by overlooking “all personal, local, and partial considerations” and by contemplating “the United States as one great whole.” Unfortunately, electoral success takes priority over the common good.

Photo of David Orentlicher David Orentlicher

David Orentlicher is the Cobeaga Law Firm Professor of Law at UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law. Nationally recognized for his expertise in constitutional law and health law, Dr. O has testified before Congress, had his scholarship cited by the U.S. Supreme…

David Orentlicher is the Cobeaga Law Firm Professor of Law at UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law. Nationally recognized for his expertise in constitutional law and health law, Dr. O has testified before Congress, had his scholarship cited by the U.S. Supreme Court, and has served on many national, state, and local commissions.

A graduate of Harvard Medical School and Harvard Law School, Dr. O is author of numerous books, articles, and essays on a wide range of topics, including presidential power, affirmative action, health care reform, physician aid in dying, and reproductive decisions. Dr. O’s work has appeared in leading professional journals, as well as in the New York TimesTimeUSA TodayCNN Opinion, the Chicago Tribune, and other major newspapers.

Between 2002 and 2008, Dr. O served in the Indiana House of Representatives, where he authored legislation to promote job creation, protect children from abuse and neglect, and make health care coverage more affordable. His most recent book, Two Presidents Are Better Than One: The Case for a Bipartisan Executive, draws on his experience with partisan conflict as an elected official and his expertise in constitutional law to discuss reforms that would address the country’s high levels of political polarization.