In the case of Brown v. Teva Pharm., Inc., 19-3700 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 23, 2019 Bartle, J.), the court found that a Plaintiff correctly argued that, where the Defendants filed a Notice of Removal in federal court before being served with the Complaint, but filed a copy of the Notice of Removal in the state court after they were served, removal was not properly completed.
As such, the court granted the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand.
Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions.” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Nov. 26, 2019).