The business model of most litigation funding agreements is straightforward. A funder provides the financial means for a client to pursue a case. If the client wins, they pay an agreed-upon percentage to the funder, usually in addition to the amount of funds provided. If the plaintiff doesn’t win, the funder is out the money. All of this is spelled out in contracts signed by involved parties. So how then can a winning plaintiff pretend they owe nothing to funders?

This content is for 1-3 Team Members, 7 Day Trial, 4-10 Team Members, 4-10 Team Members (Sponsored Member), 11-20 Team Members, 11-20 Team Members (Sponsored Member), $695 One Time Membership Rate Lock, Single Subscription, Additional 1 User, Additional 2 Users, Additional 3 Users, Additional 4 Users and 6 Pack members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read.

The post What Happens When a Winning Client Refuses to Meet Obligations to Funders? appeared first on Litigation Finance Journal.