Skip to content

Menu

ChannelsPublishersSubscribe
LexBlog, Inc. logo
LexBlog, Inc. logo
ProductsSub-MenuBlogsPortalsTwentySyndicationMicrositesResource Center
Join
Search
Close
Join the Movement. Blog 4 Good

FCC Holds Calls About Free Clinical Pharmaceutical Trials Are Not “Advertising” Under the TCPA

TCPA_854446566
By Sarah Crandall & Virginia Bell Flynn on January 22, 2021
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn

On January 15, in response to a petition from Acurian seeking clarification on the non-commercial purpose exemption, the FCC held that prerecorded calls to residential phone numbers seeking participants for FDA-mandated clinical pharmaceutical trials did not constitute “advertising” or “telemarketing” under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) because they “do not identify property, goods, or services offered for sale by Acurian.” Therefore, these types of calls do not require prior express written consent. However, the FCC made sure to note that under the new TRACED Act Order, Acurian cannot make more than one call to a given residential line within 30 days and must allow the recipient to opt out of future calls.

The FCC did not need to reach the question of whether the calls were commercial because the lack of advertising was sufficient to exempt them. It also reiterated that calls that offer a free good or service as part of an overall marketing campaign to sell a good or service still constitute commercial advertising, and other “dual purpose” calls are also suspect.

This ruling means that businesses that have been placing similar calls only to residential numbers that have given express written consent may be able to make those calls to a wider audience without running afoul of the TCPA. If a prerecorded call makes a free opportunity available, such as a clinical trial, that is not tied to any product offered for sale by the business, it may fall outside the restrictions on advertising or telemarketing, enabling it to be transmitted to a residential number without prior written consent. However, it will count toward the business’s one-call-per-thirty-days-per-number limit.

Photo of Sarah Crandall Sarah Crandall

Sarah represents clients in consumer law, business disputes, and commercial litigation as a member of the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice. The nationally ranked Consumer Financial Services practice assists clients in navigating consumer finance and privacy laws, including fair lending and fair credit…

Sarah represents clients in consumer law, business disputes, and commercial litigation as a member of the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice. The nationally ranked Consumer Financial Services practice assists clients in navigating consumer finance and privacy laws, including fair lending and fair credit reporting, debt collection, auto finance, and mortgage servicing issues.

Read more about Sarah CrandallEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Virginia Bell Flynn Virginia Bell Flynn

Virginia specializes in complex litigation, business disputes, financial services litigation, and consumer litigation.

Read more about Virginia Bell FlynnEmail Virginia Bell's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Financial
  • Blog:
    Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Stay Connected

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers

Company

  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service

Products

  • Products
  • Blogs
  • Portals
  • Twenty
  • Syndication
  • Microsites

Support

  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Tax Controversy & Financial Crimes Report
  • Roberts Disability Law Blog
  • Animal Law Update
  • International Labor and Employment Law
  • Wills, Trusts & Estates Prof Blog
Copyright © 2021, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered By LexBlog