Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

FTC Addresses Privacy Concerns over Data Collected by Health-related Apps and Devices

By Mark Nieds on November 15, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Health-related apps are widely available for smartphones and watches. There is no shortage of connected health-monitoring devices such as personal glucose and heart rate monitors.

These apps and devices read, track and record both health-related information and, by signing up for or registering the app or device, information that identifies the particular person using the app or device. Some of these apps and devices even interface with other apps or devices; for instance, syncing the calendar apps records histories like sleep cycles, heart rate or glucose levels or to forecast such as fertility cycles. The question then arises:

What protection do consumers have over the health and personal data generated by these relatively new apps and connected devices?”

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) recently issued a policy statement addressing this issue and protection of the information gathered by these relatively new technologies.

Existing Framework

Privacy of health-related information gathered by providers of healthcare services or supplies — such as physician offices and pharmacies — has long been protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”). HIPAA also contains provisions requiring healthcare providers to notify impacted individuals when HIPAA-protected data is breached or compromised and the FTC enforces those provisions.

In addition, vendors of personal health data that are not regulated under HIPAA have had to comply with the FTC’s Health Breach Notification Rule (the “Rule”) and its requirements to notify impacted individuals, the FTC and even the media of breaches involving the compromise of individually identifiable health data.

A word of caution to consumers, developers of health-related apps and devices do not necessarily fit neatly within the parameters of HIPAA and the Rule because those developers are not strictly healthcare providers under HIPAA or vendors of information subject to the Rule.

FTC Policy Statement

fitbitRecognizing this gap, the FTC issued a policy statement that in effect extends the Rule to these entities. The policy statement considers that developers of any healthcare apps that sync with or draw information from multiple inputs — such as an app that syncs with a calendar — are vendors of personal health records subject to the breach notification provisions of the Rule.

Further, the FTC also considers that developers of health apps and connected devices are to be considered “healthcare providers” under HIPAA because the apps and devices are “healthcare services or supplies.”

Accordingly, the HIPAA standards apply to information gathered by apps and devices, affording significant protection to consumers. Finally, under the policy statement, the FTC concludes that the data breach notification requirements imposed by the Rule are applicable to app and device developers whenever there is a breach of security resulting in the disclosure of “sensitive health information without users’ authorization.”

In addition, developers who fail to comply with the notice requirements under the Rule could face potential civil penalties over $40,000 per day a violation continues.

Benefit to Consumers

data privacyWith this policy statement, the FTC has not only addressed a privacy issue raised by new technologies but also corralled a group — app and device developers — who were previously outside the scope of HIPAA and the FTC rules regarding health data privacy and breach notification and placed significant requirements on them to protect the data they collect and inform consumers of any breaches.

The policy statement takes a broad view of when health apps and connected devices are covered by the Rule. Specifically, the policy statement broadly construes when health apps and connected devices are subject to provisions that apply to “vendors of personal health records that contain individually identifiable health information created or received by health care providers.”

Those needing legal assistance with data and privacy concerns may contact me at mark.nieds@henlaw.com or by phone at 239-344-1153.

Photo of Mark Nieds Mark Nieds

Mark concentrates his practice on intellectual property and Internet matters with specific emphasis on trademark selection, registration, enforcement and litigation, copyright, and trade secret protection.

For over twenty years he has advised clients on domestic and international intellectual property issues, including such matters…

Mark concentrates his practice on intellectual property and Internet matters with specific emphasis on trademark selection, registration, enforcement and litigation, copyright, and trade secret protection.

For over twenty years he has advised clients on domestic and international intellectual property issues, including such matters as new product launches, corporate rebranding projects, acquisitions and licensing. He has extensive experience with U.S. and International trademark matters, from selection and clearance of marks through registration, licensing and enforcement of rights. Mark has represented trademark owners in cease and desist matters as well as in the federal courts in infringement and counterfeiting actions. He has also been involved in numerous Opposition and Cancellation proceedings in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

In addition to intellectual property, Mark’s practice also encompasses internet-related legal issues. He has assisted clients with the creation and implementation of privacy policies, terms of use agreements, user agreements and DMCA compliance. Mark has also been involved in domain name litigation and cybersquatting matters and helped develop domain registration strategies for clients.

Mark is also involved in copyright registration and licensing, developing trade secret protection strategies, non-disclosure agreements and non-compete agreements, marketing and advertising review, and intellectual property due diligence projects.

Prior to joining Henderson Franklin, Mark practiced law in Chicago, Illinois. He was born and raised in Chicago and currently resides in Fort Myers. When not working, Mark enjoys cycling and triathlons.

Read more about Mark NiedsEmailMark's Linkedin ProfileMark's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Southwest Florida Business and IP Blog
  • Organization:
    Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Pro Policyholder
  • The Way on FDA
  • Crypto Digest
  • Inside Cybersecurity & Privacy Law
  • La Oficina Legal Ayala Hernández
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo