Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

FTC Investigates Supply Chain Issues and Impact on Consumers

By Emily Lyons, Mark Tobey, Wendy Arends & Julia Banegas on December 7, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
feature-1-shipping-660x371

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched an inquiry into the ongoing supply chain disruptions affecting a broad array of goods across the economy. Using a compulsory process to investigate the competitive impact of supply chain disruptions in consumer goods, under Section 6(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 46(b), the FTC is requiring nine large retailers, wholesalers, and consumer good suppliers to supply information on the causes for the disruptions and the ongoing impact for consumers and competition. Additionally, the FTC is requesting comments from the public, including retailers, suppliers, wholesalers, consumers, and other interested parties.

The FTC intends to understand the disruptions better and “examine whether supply chain disruptions are leading to specific bottlenecks, shortages, anticompetitive practices, or contributing to rising consumer prices.”

Mandatory Responses

Section 6(b) authorizes the FTC to conduct market studies on broad issues without a specific law enforcement purpose. The nine companies that received orders under the FTC market study have 45 days to respond.

These companies must identify the following information:

  • The primary factors that are disrupting the procurement, transportation, and distribution of their products.
  • The impact of disruptions, including on cancelled and delated orders and increased costs and prices.
  • The most affected products, suppliers, and inputs.
  • The actions taken to alleviate disruptions.
  • The allocation of products across locations when in short supply.

The FTC is also requesting internal documents from these companies related to the disruptions, including supply chain strategies, inventory strategies including the use of category captains, pricing, marketing, acceptance or use of trade promotions, costs, profit margins, sales volumes, selection of suppliers and brands, and market shares.

Voluntary Public Comments

In addition to these ordered disclosures, the FTC is requesting voluntary comments from retailers, suppliers, wholesalers, consumers, and other interested parties. The FTC is requesting comments that provide information on related issues and examples of the impacts that supply chain disruptions have had on competition.

For retailers, manufacturers, suppliers, and wholesalers, the FTC is looking for similar information as that outlined for the mandatory respondents, such as the causes, affects, and experiences of disruptions. This would include the competitive effects from disruptions, solutions adopted to alleviate the disruptions, and products and input categories affected. Additionally, the FTC is requesting information on the outlook on disruption over the next quarter and year, the impact of any expected shortages, and the impact of slotting fees or category captains, if applicable.  One question underlying the FTC study appears to be whether large national retailers are getting preferential treatment compared to smaller retailers due to their extensive use of specialized services provided by manufacturers and suppliers.

For consumers, the FTC is requesting comments related to the impact that the disruptions have had on product choice, prices, and choice of retailers.

The public comments will be published on regulations.gov, and as such the FTC has warned to not include any sensitive or confidential information. Additionally, there is a chance that the FTC would follow-up to a public comment with a mandatory order for information.

Voluntary comments are due to the FTC on January 29, 2022. If you are interested in filing public comments or have questions about the process, please contact your Husch Blackwell attorney.

Photo of Emily Lyons Emily Lyons

Emily grew up on a northern Illinois dairy farm, and now helps clients bridge the gap from farm to fork. She guides clients on complex regulatory issues as they bring dairy products, beverages, fruits and vegetables, processed foods and other agricultural goods to…

Emily grew up on a northern Illinois dairy farm, and now helps clients bridge the gap from farm to fork. She guides clients on complex regulatory issues as they bring dairy products, beverages, fruits and vegetables, processed foods and other agricultural goods to market. At the intersection of agriculture, food and environment, Emily handles compliance matters such as labeling, marketing, permitting and agency inquiries including the Food Safety Modernization Act, Pasteurized Milk Ordinance, USDA National Organic Program and bioengineered food disclosure standard, Generally Recognized as Safe status for food additives and food contact substances, and the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65).

Read more about Emily LyonsEmailEmily's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Mark Tobey Mark Tobey

Mark counsels food and agribusiness clients on antitrust and competition issues, helping them mitigate risk in an increasingly complex business and regulatory environment.

Read more about Mark TobeyEmail
Photo of Wendy Arends Wendy Arends

Wendy navigates complex antitrust and competition issues that arise during mergers, acquisitions and collaborations between competitors in a variety of industries. A seasoned attorney, Wendy understands and enjoys handling complex antitrust and competition issues. Businesses, trade associations and other organizations – particularly within

…

Wendy navigates complex antitrust and competition issues that arise during mergers, acquisitions and collaborations between competitors in a variety of industries. A seasoned attorney, Wendy understands and enjoys handling complex antitrust and competition issues. Businesses, trade associations and other organizations – particularly within healthcare and allied sectors – rely on Wendy’s unique experience. She has collaborated on some of the nation’s most significant recent healthcare antitrust matters, including FTC and State of Idaho v. St. Luke’s Health System, which addressed integration and consolidation of healthcare providers in the wake of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Read more about Wendy ArendsEmailWendy's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Julia Banegas Julia Banegas

Julia enjoys helping clients move business forward in highly regulated sectors. With her interest in the heavily regulated areas of government contracts and international trade, Julia helps clients conduct business smoothly across the nation, and throughout the world.

Read more about Julia BanegasEmail
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Food & Ag Law Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • International Dispute Resolution
  • China Law Update Blog
  • Law of The Ledger
  • Antitrust Law Blog
  • Your ERISA Watch
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo