In Estate of Daniels v. City of Indianapolis, et al., Indiana Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore granted the plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees of $2,311.50 in fees incurred by the plaintiff in bringing her motion to compel, rejecting several arguments by defendants, including their argument that the plaintiff served discovery requests via email when the defendants did not consent to receiving discovery electronically, because “Defendants still responded to each discovery request received via email and did so at length”.
The post Motion for Attorney Fees Granted Over Defendants’ Dilatory Tactics: eDiscovery Case Law appeared first on eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin.