Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Mass. ATB Rejects Pre-Wayfair Application of Taxation of Out-of-State Seller Under Massachusetts’ Internet Vendor Rule

By Eva Hellwig on January 31, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Until the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 2018 decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, states could not require out-of-state sellers to collect and remit sales or use tax unless the seller had a physical presence in that state. The Wayfair court examined a South Dakota statute that did not require physical presence to establish sales tax nexus and overruled its previous decision in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota that required in-state physical presence for states to require out-of-state vendors to collect and remit sales or use tax. The question remained, however, whether states could retroactively tax out-of-state sellers under these regulations for the time between the regulations’ implementation and the Wayfair decision.

Please click here to read the full article.

Photo of Eva Hellwig Eva Hellwig
Read more about Eva HellwigEmail
  • Posted in:
    Financial, Tax
  • Blog:
    Disputing Tax
  • Organization:
    Ropes & Gray
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Scott Technology Attorneys Blog
  • Joe Raczynski | Technologist
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19): Guidance for Businesses
  • GovCon & Trade
  • Pro Policyholder
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo