Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

LVN Probationary License Saved After Cocaine Ingestion

By John Bishop on March 28, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, like all state healing arts agencies such as the Board of Registered Nursing and the Medical Board of California, takes the requirements of its probation program very seriously. In 2021, we were able to represent an LVN who tested positive for cocaine while under the supervision of the LVN’s probation program. The Board had the positive drug test and the expert witness testimony of the president of the laboratory and testing company who conducted the test.

The nurse explained to us the circumstances of the accidental exposure. The client’s explanation to the probation monitor (which had to be provided immediately under the terms of probation) was consistent with the explanation to our office. The Board elected to pursue a Petition to Revoke Probation against our client and was unwilling to entertain settlement. We defended the client at an administrative hearing before the Office of Administrative Hearings.

At hearing, our client again testified credibly. The client’s supervisor testified as a witness on her behalf. The Board’s expert admitted, during cross examination, that the circumstances of the ingestion of cocaine, as explained by the client, were unusual but possible. The Administrative Law Judge found the exposure to be an outlier and, rather than revoking the license and ending our client’s career, extended the probation for one additional year. The client was able to return to work.

Even when the agency refuses to accept a client’s explanation, that does not mean that the client is lying or that the client will not be believed by an Administrative Law Judge. This case illustrates the principle that consistency and employer support are important pillars of a license defense case, even when the situation looks impossible to defend. We were proud to represent this client and help them continue to safely practice nursing. Ray & Bishop defends nurse licenses against allegations of substance abuse.

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor, Health Care
  • Blog:
    California License Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Ray & Bishop
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo