Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Search and Seizure powers of the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors

By Sean Donaldson on May 13, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

High profile corporate collapses and judicial commissions of enquiry have shone the spotlight on the possible role of auditors in these matters.  In what can be considered a step by the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) to strengthen its ability to investigate such allegations, it published its new disciplinary rules effective from 01 April 2022.

In terms of these rules IRBA has the authority to perform search and seizure operations on any registered auditor’s home or office with consent or under the authority of a court authorised search warrant. During the search the authorised person has the right to open any safe, cabinet or container which is believe may hold evidence, as well as question any individual on the premises who is believed may have information that pertains to the investigation.

Although extensive and invasive in nature, the rules have built in safeguards to ensure a just and fair process which would not unduly infringe on an auditor’s rights.  These include that:

  • a certificate must be obtained from the chairperson of the IRBA disciplinary committee authorising the IRBA representative to enter the premises and search for any document or item that may assist in their ongoing investigation.
  • despite the certificate, the person who is apparently in control of the property must give consent for the search and seizure operation to be conducted.
  • without asking for consent at the outset or if consent is refused, the IRBA must obtain a court issued search warrant
  • the authorised person conducting the search has the responsibility to conduct the search discreetly, as quickly as possible, and in such a manner that they only disturb areas and items that could reasonably relate to the investigation underway at the time.
  • the authorised person may inspect and if necessary, retain any relevant information for the purposes of its investigations they may also make copies of and take extracts from such information

Given the requirements and safeguards associated with the process, auditors should be alive to these rules and their rights should they be faced with a search and seizure based on either a search certificate or search warrant.

  • Posted in:
    Financial
  • Blog:
    Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Stridon News and Insights
  • Taft Class Action & Consumer Insights
  • Labor and Employment Law Insights
  • Age of Disruption
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo