Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

ERISA LIENS AND YOUR PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT

By Joe Patton on January 26, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

ERISA LIENS AND YOUR PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT

After you struggle through all the investigation, settlement negotiations, litigation, medication, and perhaps a trial you have another hurdle to cross: liens. Liens come in all shapes and sizes. I want to focus on what is called ERISA Liens. ERISA is a federal law the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, ERISA for short. Passed in 1974 we are still litigating and asking the courts what the language actually means as it applies to various situations. We are concerned here with how it will help or hurt our personal injury settlement. If the ERISA health plan paid medical for the underlying injury in your personal injury claim they are entitled to be reimbursed from your recovery.

The Federal law applies if this is a self-funded plan where the employer is funding the plan. This can be confusing because often the customer will only be having dealings with the administrator of the fund which is often an insurance company. If the employer is paying an insurance premium to an health insurance company who pays the medical bills laws other than ERISA apply.

This is a complicated area of law and we will not be dealing with all the ends and outs in this short article.

The ERISA fund can enforce the lien under section 502(a)(3)(B) against the person holding the funds . See Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, inc. (2006) 547 U.S. 356

The U.S. Supreme Court held:

“1 the ERISA plan’s terms, not unjust enrichment or other equitable principles, govern a plan administrator’s action to enforce an equitable lien by agreement, abrogating and

2 the common-fund rule informs interpretation of a plan’s reimbursement provision and, where a plan is silent on the allocation of attorney fees, the doctrine provides the appropriate default”US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 569 U.S. 88, 88 (2013)

The court in Arkansas Dept. of Health and Human Services v. Ahlborn (2006) 126 S.Ct. 1752 reduced the lien because the plaintiff’s recovery was less due to comparative fault.

Here are some additional links with general information:

Erisa Plans: Could They Affect My Car Accident Settlement?

Personal Injury Lawyer www.joepatton.com

Photo of Joe Patton Joe Patton

Joe Patton is the Senior Partner of the law firm Patton and Patton in Topeka and Lenexa, Kansas, former Kansas State Representative

Read more about Joe PattonEmailJoe's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Personal Injury
  • Blog:
    Joe's Coffee Break
  • Organization:
    Patton and Patton
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • U.S. Legal Insights for Korean Businesses
  • Latin American Blog
  • Intellectual Property Law Blog
  • Insurance Law Blog
  • Global Projects View
Copyright © 2023, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo