Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Motion for Summary Judgement Denied: Battle over California Climate Legislation Continues

By Sehrish Siddiqui on November 8, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Soon after California passed far-reaching climate legislation last year (referred to herein as SB 253 and SB 261; see our earlier blog post here and here for background), it was challenged in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (the district court).  In Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. California Air Resources Board et al., No. 2:24-cv-00801 (C.D. Cal. 2024), the plaintiffs claimed that SB 253 and 261 violated the First Amendment, among other constitutional challenges. 

The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment prior to discovery on the First Amendment matter, claiming that strict scrutiny applies and that SB 253 and SB 261 fail any level of First Amendment scrutiny. The defendants moved to deny or defer the plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, claiming that the First Amendment does not apply to SB 253 and SB 261 and that even if it did, they would withstand strict or intermediate scrutiny.

On November 5th, the district court granted the defendants’ motion and denied plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment with leave to re-file.

In denying the plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, the district court noted that “[t]o determine what level of scrutiny to apply, the Court needs a record on whether SBs 253 and 261 regulate a substantial number of companies that do not make potentially misleading environmental claims.” The district court noted it did not yet have the requisite information to perform “fact-driven” First Amendment analysis.

Additionally, in a challenge to the defendants, the district court noted that the First Amendment does in fact apply to SB 253 and SB 261.

We can expect the court battle to continue for an extended period of time, with discovery and briefing on the merits of each of the plaintiffs’ claims.  In contrast to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) climate disclosure rules, these rules have not been stayed pending the outcome of the litigation.  Companies should continue preparing for the implementation of this legislation as these legal challenges continue. 

If you have any questions about how this legislation may impact your business, please contact the author or your Bass, Berry & Sims relationship attorney.

Photo of Sehrish Siddiqui Sehrish Siddiqui

Sehrish Siddiqui counsels a wide variety of public companies primarily in the areas of corporate finance, compliance and governance. She regularly advises clients on ESG (environmental, social and governance) disclosures and related internal processes. She has served as counsel to underwriters, agents and…

Sehrish Siddiqui counsels a wide variety of public companies primarily in the areas of corporate finance, compliance and governance. She regularly advises clients on ESG (environmental, social and governance) disclosures and related internal processes. She has served as counsel to underwriters, agents and issuers for more than 100 initial public offerings, follow-on offerings and at-the-market programs of various NYSE- and Nasdaq-traded entities. Her national and international clients include healthcare companies, real estate investment trusts, business development companies, retail and consumer product companies and investment banks.

Read more about Sehrish SiddiquiEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial, Corporate Compliance
  • Blog:
    Securities Law Exchange
  • Organization:
    Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo