Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Federal Court Emphasizes Strict Adherence to Mechanic’s Lien Statute

By John Mark Goodman on March 7, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
A Costly Oversight: Federal Court Emphasizes Strict Adherence to Mechanic's Lien

A federal judge in New York served up a good reminder last week about the importance of dotting your i’s and crossing your t’s when it comes to perfecting a mechanic’s lien.  The case involves a payment dispute between a subcontractor and general contractor on a police station renovation project in the Bronx. 

The subcontractor liened the job and brought suit to foreclose its lien (among other claims). The New York lien law at issue for public improvement works provides that a lien “shall not continue for a longer period than one year from the time of filing the notice of such lien, unless an action is commenced to foreclose such lien within that time, and a notice of the pendency of such action is filed with the comptroller of the state or the financial officer of the public corporation with whom the notice of such lien was filed.”  N.Y. Lien Law Section 18 (emphasis added). The subcontractor had filed its lien and a lawsuit to enforce it within one year but had failed to file the notice of pendency.   The subcontractor’s lien had therefore automatically expired after one year.  The subcontractor argued that the notice of pendency was unnecessary because the contractor had bonded off the lien.  The court rejected that argument and dismissed the subcontractor’s lien claim. The case is J&A Concrete Corp. v. Dobco Inc., 2025 WL 605252 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2025).  A copy of the court’s opinion is located here. 

If you have questions about filing, perfecting, executing or defending against construction liens, please contact John Mark Goodman.  Bradley has construction lawyers licensed in the majority of states throughout the country who can assist.  

Photo of John Mark Goodman John Mark Goodman

John Mark Goodman has been with Bradley his entire legal career as a member of Bradley’s Litigation and Construction practice groups. He has an engineering degree from Georgia Tech and a law degree from Virginia. John Mark has had the privilege of representing…

John Mark Goodman has been with Bradley his entire legal career as a member of Bradley’s Litigation and Construction practice groups. He has an engineering degree from Georgia Tech and a law degree from Virginia. John Mark has had the privilege of representing clients throughout the U.S. and abroad in a wide variety of litigation and arbitration matters, including construction disputes, products liability claims, tax appeals, breach of contract/warranty, patent disputes, trade secret theft, and general commercial litigation.

Read more about John Mark GoodmanEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    BuildSmart
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo