In De Coster v. Amazon.com, Washington District Judge John H. Chun, after conducting an in camera review of documents designed as privileged by Amazon, determined that “54 out of the 85 documents reviewed in camera must be produced to Plaintiffs in full or with some redactions.” He also denied Amazon’s request to claw back two documents, finding that the production was intentional.
The post 54 Out of 85 Documents Reviewed In Camera Must Be Produced, Says Court: eDiscovery Case Law appeared first on eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin.