Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Litigation Over PFAS Designation as Hazardous Substances Remains on Hold

By Vanessa Pinto on May 9, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On April 30, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted an additional 30-day abeyance in the challenge to EPA’s Final Rule designating Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS) as CERCLA Hazardous Substances.  (89 Fed. Reg. 39124 (May 8, 2024).

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requested an additional 30 days for leadership to conclude its review of the underlying rule.  The agency stated that the continued abeyance would conserve judicial and party resources and could potentially obviate the need for judicial resolution of the disputed issues.  The petitioners and respondent-intervenors did not oppose the request.

This case has been in abeyance since February 2025 following EPA’s request for a 60-day abeyance to allow incoming leadership to review the contested rule.  That pause was set to expire on April 24, 2025. 

Since the initial pause in PFAS litigation, EPA announced its strategy for combatting PFAS contamination that includes designating a PFAS agency lead, developing effluent limitations guidelines for PFAS manufacturers, and creating a clear “polluter pays” liability framework. While the announcement provides a broad framework, it does not specifically address whether EPA will continue to support the designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances.

We’ll continue to monitor the docket for further developments and provide updates as the case progresses. 

  • Posted in:
    Environmental
  • Blog:
    PFAS and Emerging Contaminants
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo