Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

"The Nuances of Prosecutorial Nonenforcement"

By Douglas Berman on May 12, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The title of this post is the title of this new article authored by Carissa Byrne Hessick and Meighan Parsh now available via SSRN. Here is its abstract:

The academic literature on prosecutors is divided: Some commentors believe that prosecutors should use their ability to decline to bring charges more aggressively, decreasing the overall number of criminal cases and helping to address the problem of mass incarceration.  Others believe that broad prosecutorial nonenforcement poses significant risks to our constitutional order and to public safety.  While the visibility of this debate has increased-spilling over from the pages of law reviews into political campaigns and headlines-the terms of that debate are, at times, unclear. Prosecutorial nonenforcement is a multi-faceted phenomenon, and discussions about its costs and benefits can obscure necessary tradeoffs between important values and principles.

This Article brings much needed nuance to the debate surrounding prosecutorial nonenforcement.  It provides a three-tiered taxonomy of nonenforcement decisions, identifying different nonenforcement methods, justifications, and decisionmakers. It also explains how different features of nonenforcement implicate conflicting values, such as individualization and consistency.  By providing this taxonomy and highlighting these tradeoffs, the Article seeks to improve the terms of the debate surrounding prosecutorial nonenforcement.  In so doing, it demonstrates that, although abstract discussions about nonenforcement can be valuable, they are no substitute for an assessment of the substance of those decisions.

Douglas Berman

Douglas A. Berman is a professor of criminal law and sentencing at Ohio State University and author of Sentencing Law and Policy–the first blog cited by the U.S. Supreme Court–and the Marijuana Law, Policy & Reform blog. He is frequently consulted for…

Douglas A. Berman is a professor of criminal law and sentencing at Ohio State University and author of Sentencing Law and Policy–the first blog cited by the U.S. Supreme Court–and the Marijuana Law, Policy & Reform blog. He is frequently consulted for his expertise on capital sentencing by national policymakers, lawyers, and major media publications.

Read more about Douglas BermanEmailDouglas A.'s Linkedin ProfileDouglas A.'s Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Criminal
  • Blog:
    Sentencing Law and Policy
  • Organization:
    Law Professor Blogs Network
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo