Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Trump signs resolution nullifying CFPB overdraft rule

By Ballard CFS Group on May 12, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Shot of an ATM machine at night.
Jake Allen, Unsplash

President Trump has signed a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution nullifying the CFPB’s controversial overdraft rule.

The rule was issued by the Biden Administration and had attracted opposition from Republicans on Capitol Hill and Trump Administration officials. House and Senate Republicans pushed a CRA resolution through Congress, which Trump has now signed, voiding the rule.

If it had been allowed to go into effect as issued, the rule would have limited overdraft fees to $5 at financial institutions with more than $10 billion in assets, unless they set a cap that covered their actual costs or they treated the payment of an overdraft as a loan and gave appropriate disclosures under the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z.

Financial trade groups sued, challenging the rule, which was scheduled to go into effect on October 1, 2025. However, anticipating changes to the rule, Acting OMB and CFPB Director Russell Vought asked for a stay in the lawsuit.

Trump had no comment when he signed the resolution. However, Office of Management and Budget officials had previously issued a Statement of Administration Policy saying the rule would have resulted in “six million consumers facing higher fees and more bounced checks. It also [would have limited] consumer choice by depriving Americans of the option to choose overdraft services to meet short-term liquidity needs, forcing them into higher-cost financial products. Overturning this rule would advance this Administration’s deregulatory agenda.”

Congressional sponsors of the nullification resolution applauded Trump’s veto.

“The rule would have reduced access to credit and important financial services and resulted in more unbanked Americans,” Senate Banking Chairman Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., said.

House Financial Services Chairman Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., also said he supported Trump having signed the resolution. 

“Americans voted for consumer choice, not government overregulation,” he said.

  • Posted in:
    Featured Posts, Financial
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance Monitor
  • Organization:
    Ballard Spahr LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo