Uscher, Quiat, Uscher & Russo, P.C.

Uscher, Quiat, Uscher & Russo, is a disability claims law firm located in the NY/NJ Metropolitan Area. The firm has over 30 years of experience with disability insurance claims, appeals and litigation. Disability claim law is the firm's specialty, and it provides clients with the help they need through high-quality legal counsel. The firm concentrates on winning battles on behalf of individuals against insurance companies, and has been highly successful in winning millions of dollars in life, health, and disability insurance benefits for clients.

Website: https://www.uqur.com/
Follow:

Uscher, Quiat, Uscher & Russo, P.C. Blogs

Quiat on Claims

Blog Authors

Michael Quiat

Latest from Uscher, Quiat, Uscher & Russo, P.C.

A recent case caused Merck & Co. to go down swinging on every pitch served up by the Third Circuit when it comes to being arbitrary and capricious. Kosiba v.Merck & Company, 2011 WL 843927, set forth a procedural laundry list of errors by a plan administrator which would lead a court to find an administrator’s decision terminating LTD benefits to be arbitrary and capricious.…
Some doctors who examine for insurance companies feel free to play fast and loose with the truth when making reports on the condition of out of work employees because they do not have to fear malpractice claims.  Although fear of malpractice claims has been heavily overplayed by doctors and insurers in recent years, the plain fact is that insurance company doctors don’t have to fear malpractice claims since the person being examined is not the…
You don’t have to be overly smart to understand why ERISA insurance companies do things in the most frustrating way imaginable. Frustration is the primary tool of the insurance companies.  If they can get a claimant thinking he or she is battling an impenetrable wall of bureaucracy, they are more than halfway home to getting the claimant to give up the claim.  And that’s where a good part of the money insurance companies make can…
We have previously written about the serious problems which result when insurance companies hire doctors to perform “paper reviews” of insurance claims without ever meeting or examining the patient, and then use those paper reviews to justify termination of benefits. In an ERISA context, this is particularly difficult because claimants are denied in most cases the opportunity to confront those professional reviewers or to cross examine them to show they are financially biased or otherwise…
With all of the specialized, technical ”legalese” an ERISA attorney must know to do a proper job for a client, you wouldn’t think that knowledge of cooking and laundry would play a part. But, you would be wrong.…
One of the things that some attorneys overlook when settling a third party claim in an ERISA matter is the effect of the insurance company subrogation lien on the proceeds of the settlement. ERISA gives a plan administrator the power to have a lien on the proceeds of any such settlement. Courts have a history of zealously protecting that lien for plan administrators.…
When you write a blog, you write into a void. You think you have something to say that people want to read. But, do they really? This is our 200th blog post. We should mark it in some way. How? Maybe by trying to express why we blog?…
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has clarified the issue of when an ERISA claimant is entitled to attorney fees from a plan administrator: When you win, you are entitled to recover fees. This ruling came in an opinion in which the Court reversed a lower court which had denied legal fees and costs to a claimant because the judge couldn’t find that the insurance company had acted in “bad faith”.…
Many people have lawyers in their family. Maybe your brother-in-law? But, if you have an ERISA disability claim, it is not for your lawyer brother-in-law to handle just because he’s related to you. Many lawyers know little more about ERISA than do the people they undertake to represent.…
If you want a prime example of why we hammer at you to read your policy before you accept it, take a look at Nunn, et al. v. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company, 2014 WL 684980 (2nd Cir. 2014). Although the plaintiffs, both NBA basketball referees, didn’t read their policies, the court gave them a shot at prevailing because they didn’t get the coverage they were clearly led to believe they were getting.…