IT Law Today

News & Updates on the Lifecycle of Electronic Information Management

Blog Authors

Latest from IT Law Today

Technology Assisted Review (TAR) / Predictive Coding — New Decision Thanks to Hon. (Ret.)  Andrew J. Peck, now Senior Counsel at DLA Piper, I just learned of a hot-off-the-presses (yesterday) Technology Assisted Review decision by the Utah federal district court. For a quote from, and link to, the Entrata decision, check out the recent updates to the TAR / Predictive Coding Library I maintain at this blog site. And while you’re there, you’ll see another…
EU GDPR eDiscovery — Top Ten Tips for Litigators by Robert Brownstone and Tyler Newby (with thanks to Shannon Turner and Sandra Pomeroy) NOT LEGAL ADVICE.  This non-exhaustive Letterman-style list is to help you spot the GDPR’s potential impacts on data collection and production in litigation involving EU persons Overview (10. – 6.) 10.   The European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) went into effect on May 25, 2018.   It applies to the processing…
Hi all.    Exterro has recently published what looks like a fine overview of the eDiscovery process, “The Basics of E-Discovery Guide.”  It describes a wide range of topics in easily digestible chunks. Sprinkled throughout are quotes from various folks in the eDiscovery field.  Yours truly is one of those people.  My snippet is at the very bottom of Chapter 1, “Process“. The Guide is also downloadable in .pdf form. Happy reading .…
Introduction Now that you’ve likely had your fill of turkey sandwiches, turkey salad, turkey soup and the like, there is a new development on which to focus.  On midnight December 1, 2015 the eDiscovery-related Federal Rules of Civil Procedure changed for the first time since their adoption exactly nine years ago. The changes fall into three categories: I.     FRCP 26(b)(1)’s very definition of the scope of discovery now seems narrower than under the old version in…
Check out the following items issued this week by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck in Rio Tinto PLC v. Vale S.A., No. 14 Civ. 3042 (RMB) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y): Opinion & Order (3/3/15) [“Predictive Coding  . . .  a.k.a. Technology Assisted Review (TAR) – Da Silva Moore Revisited”] Stipulation and Order re: Use of Predictive Coding in Discovery (3/2/15) Both are discussed in this hot off the presses article by SeanDoherty in Law Technology News:  Federal Court
In an odd electronic signature (eSignature) context, on December 30, 2014 a California appellate court reversed a trial court’s upholding of a settlement agreement based on a typewritten name in an email string.    See J.B.B. Investment Partners v. Fair, 2014 WL 7421609 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 12/30/14). The circumstances made clear to the appeals court that the parties were anticipating a wet signature on a line on the email attachment; and the gist of the string was…
Of course, if you can implement a more high tech eSignatures regime, do so.  For examples of available platforms, see the “Vendors” links in my eSignatures Bibliography. In any event, here is a lower tech method  . . .   STEP ONE If the final content of the agreement is available in Word format, convert the agreement into .PDF: Open the relevant Word file. Choose Create PDF from the Acrobat drop-down menu Agree to save…