Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Interpreters – Where Do They Stand Now?

By Michael Cassidy on November 4, 2005
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The DHHS had issued guidance entitled “Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons.” Several individual physicians and professional associations sought to enjoin the Guidance, but a federal district court ruled that the Guidance had not cause sufficient damage or injury nor threatened future damage or injury sufficient to make the case ripe for decision. The mere fact that the Guidance Document is not aligned with the organizations advocacy an litigation goals does not constitute a concrete and particularized injury or create a Article III case here. View the guidance on the DHHS Web site.
Colwell v. HHS, S.D. Cal. No. 04CV1748, 3/7/05.

  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Med Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Tucker Arensberg, PC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo