Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Consideration: A Required Element For An Enforceable Contract

By Scott I. Unger on November 1, 2006
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

A contract is an agreement resulting in obligation enforceable at law; it is “a voluntary obligation proceeding from a common intention arising from an offer and acceptance.” Johnson and Johnson v. Charmley Drug Co., 11 N.J. 526, 539 (1953). To be an enforceable contract there must be a definite offer, acceptance of that offer and consideration. Friedman v. Tappan Dev. Corp., 22 N.J. 523, 531 (1956). Thus, without consideration there can be no contract. Contl. Bank of Pa. v. Barclay Riding Acad., Inc., 93 N.J. 153, 170 (1983), cert. denied, Barclay Equestrian Ctr., Inc. v. Contl. Bank of Pa., 464 U.S. 994 (1983).

What is Consideration?

A simple way of defining consideration is to say that both sides must “get something out of the exchange.” Contl. Bank of Pa., 93 N.J. at 170; Friedman, 22 N.J. at 533; 1 Corbin, Contract §110 (1963 ed.). Valuable consideration may take the form of either a detriment incurred by the promisee or benefit received by the promisor. Contl. Bank of Pa., 93 N.J. at 170; Novak v. Cities Serv. Oil Co., 149 N.J. Super. 542, 549 (Law Div. 1977), aff’d, 159 N.J. Super. 400 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 78 N.J. 396 (1978); 1 Corbin, Contract §§121-122 (1963 ed.).

If consideration is met, there is no additional requirement of gain or benefit of the promisor, loss or detriment to the promisee, equivalence in values exchanged, or mutually of obligation. Shebar v. Sanyo Bus. Sys. Corp., 111 N.J. at 289 (adopting Restatement (Second) of Contracts §79 (1979)). In other words, Courts will not measure the adequacy of consideration. Rather, the only analysis is to determine whether or not consideration is present in the contract. See Seaview Orthopedics v. Natl. Healthcare Resources, Inc., 366 N.J. Super. 501, 509 (App. Div. 2004). Thus, if both parties even received something nominal a Court will find the existence of consideration as a matter of law.

Technorati Tags: New Jersey : Contracts

Photo of Scott I. Unger Scott I. Unger

Scott I. Unger is a member of Stark & Stark’s Litigation Group, where he concentrates his practice on litigation arising out of business and commercial disputes. Mr. Unger regularly counsels business owners on the prosecution and defense of minority oppression litigation (corporate divorces)…

Scott I. Unger is a member of Stark & Stark’s Litigation Group, where he concentrates his practice on litigation arising out of business and commercial disputes. Mr. Unger regularly counsels business owners on the prosecution and defense of minority oppression litigation (corporate divorces), breach of contract cases, uniform commercial code (U.C.C.) litigation, consumer fraud claims, appellate practice, employment, and estate litigation.

Read more about Scott I. UngerEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    New Jersey Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Stark & Stark
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo