Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Consumer reaction to off-label use

By Bexis on December 12, 2006
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

We saw this morning the attached description of consumer awareness, and approval, of off-label use of prescription drugs. (This squib came from a service available at owner-managedcare@wire-source.com, but we weren’t sure that a link would take you directly to this item, so we’re reproducing the item here, with attribution.) For lawyers trying cases that involve off-label use of a drug or device, it may be helpful to know jurors’ uneducated reaction to off-label use. Here’s the squib:

Study: Patients Unsure About Viability Of Off-Label Prescriptions

ROCHESTER, NY (Managed Care Wire): U.S. adults are either divided or ambivalent when it comes to the issue of off-label prescription drug use, according to the latest Wall Street Journal Online/Harris Interactive Health-Care Poll. While it is legal for doctors to prescribe prescription drugs for diseases other than those for which they have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), there are strict rules governing the marketing of a drug for treatment of a disease for which it hasn’t been approved. About one-third (27 percent) of adults say that prescribing drugs off-label should be allowed, while one-third say in most cases, the risks of doing so outweigh the benefits.
Interestingly, half (50 percent) of all adults incorrectly believe that once a drug is approved, a doctor can prescribe it only for the diseases for which it has been approved by the FDA, and another quarter (25 percent) are unsure. Nearly half (48 percent) think that doctors should not be allowed to prescribe drugs for off-label uses and even more (69 percent) think drug companies should not be allowed to encourage off-label use. However, a plurality (55 percent) agrees that if doctors aren’t allowed to prescribe freely, it will be much more difficult to find new and innovative ways to treat diseases.
Approximately one in three (31 percent) adults believes that in most cases, the benefits of off-label prescription drug use outweigh the risks, but an equal proportion (34 percent) believes the opposite is true. The greatest level of agreement amongst adults in this poll is on the potential prohibition of off-label prescription drug use, except as part of a clinical trial, with nearly two-thirds (62 percent) agreeing with such restrictions.
Payers looking for ways to contain the rising costs of healthcare can take away one clear message from the study’s results. “Precedent has been set for prohibiting payment for certain types of surgical procedures except to patients who are enrolled in a clinical trial,” explains Katherine Binns, Division President of Healthcare Research for Harris Interactive. “These findings suggest that U.S. adults do not want to hamper innovation, but would also be supportive of increased oversight and limitations being applied to the off-label use of prescription drugs.”

Photo of Bexis Bexis

JAMES M. BECK is Reed Smith’s only Senior Life Sciences Policy Analyst, resident in the firm’s Philadelphia office. He is the author of, among other things, Drug and Medical Device Product Liability Handbook (2004) (with Anthony Vale). He wrote the seminal law review…

JAMES M. BECK is Reed Smith’s only Senior Life Sciences Policy Analyst, resident in the firm’s Philadelphia office. He is the author of, among other things, Drug and Medical Device Product Liability Handbook (2004) (with Anthony Vale). He wrote the seminal law review article on off-label use cited by the Supreme Court in Buckman v. Plaintiffs Legal Committee. He has written more amicus briefs for the Product Liability Advisory Council than anyone else in the history of the organization, and in 2011 won PLAC’s highest honor, the John P. Raleigh award. He has been a member of the American Law Institute (ALI) since 2005. He is the long-time editor of the newsletter of the ABA’s Mass Torts Committee.  He is vice chair of the Class Actions and Multi-Plaintiff Litigation SLG of DRI’s Drug and Device Committee.  He can be reached at jmbeck@reedsmith.com.  His LinkedIn page is here.

Read more about BexisEmailJames's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Drug & Device Law
  • Organization:
    Drug & Device Law Blogging Team
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo