Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

No new list created for Petitioners placed on eligible list one month before expiration

By Kevin Sheerin on February 22, 2007
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Carozza v. City of New York N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.,2007 – February 13, 2007

Public employees were improperly disqualified from the promotions list. They were placed on the promotions list one month before its expiration. They petitioned to have a separate promotions list established for them that wouldn’t expire in one month. The Court rejected this because the initial improper disqualification wasn’t a flaw in the entire process that would require the Court not to recognize the expiring list and therefore replace it with the separate list requested.

The Department of Citywide Administrative Services handles NYC personnel issues.

  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Civil Service Disqualification Appeals Attorney Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheerin Law
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo