Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

International roaming deemed to be subject to FCC regulation

By Donald Evans on July 27, 2007
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a little-noticed Report and Order issued in June, the FCC addressed a number of issues regarding international telecommunications services which had been pending for some years.  One of the more interesting items was the FCC’s determination that when customers of US-based CMRS carriers roam abroad, their calls back to the US over foreign carriers’ facilities are an international call subject to US law.

The status of roaming has been very cloudy at the FCC — some view it as merely a billing arrangement among carriers while others view it as a common carrier service subject to the full panoply of Title II regulation under the Communications Act.  In the June Order, the FCC ruled that roaming is indeed a common carrier service, which means that a CMRS carrier must have a so-called Section 214 certificate in order to offer international roaming  to its customers while abroad.

This may stimulate a run for such certificates since the need for them had not been clear prior to this Order.  In addition, although the FCC did not address this issue, the logic of its reasoning would suggest that foreign CMRS carriers whose customers roam in the US must also have a Section 214 authorization from the FCC – something most foreign carriers have never bothered to acquire.  More business for the International Bureau.

Photo of Donald Evans Donald Evans

Don Evans has a practice covering a wide spectrum of telecommunications fields. He has historically represented major commercial mobile radio providers, having participated in the cellular radio and PCS services since their inception. He has litigated complex broadcast and common carrier hearings before…

Don Evans has a practice covering a wide spectrum of telecommunications fields. He has historically represented major commercial mobile radio providers, having participated in the cellular radio and PCS services since their inception. He has litigated complex broadcast and common carrier hearings before the FCC’s ALJs. In addition, he provides counsel and routine filing assistance to multi-station broadcast concerns. He conceived, and overcame strong FCC opposition to a plan that would require the FCC to authorize TV stations to move from small towns in the Rockies to the New York and Philadelphia metro areas. An early practitioner in the field of “wireless cable,” he continues to represent Broadband Radio Service companies and their affiliated educational partners through the FCC process.

Read more about Donald EvansEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    CommLawBlog
  • Organization:
    Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo