Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Honey, I Shrunk the Antenna

By Mitchell Lazarus on September 11, 2007
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The FCC has changed the rules for 10.7-11.7 GHz fixed microwave antennas, allowing service providers to install dishes that are only two feet in diameter, instead of the mostly four foot units heretofore required. 

The band in question is well suited to “backhaul” of wireless services — i.e., the delivery of signals to and from the familiar cell towers dotting the landscape. As the wireless phone companies roll out mobile broadband and other data-hungry services, they need more capacity — not only from tower to customer, usually carried on auctioned spectrum, but also from their own distribution facilities to the towers. Some of that traffic moves over fiber, but microwave is easier to install at many locations. 

Until now, FCC rules required large antennas at both ends of the link. Some towers and rooftop mountings cannot accommodate the weight and wind-induced forces. Big antennas are expensive. And many zoning authorities try to ban them as being unsightly.

FiberTower Corporation, a leading backhaul provider, went to the FCC three years ago with a proposed rule change to make two-foot dishes lawful. The smaller units have one disadvantage: a somewhat wider beam of radio energy, potentially causing interference to other users off to the sides. But FiberTower proposed an ancillary rule adjustment to ensure that no one else in the band suffered harm. 

Opposition came mostly from the satellite industry, which has limited use of the same frequencies. Satellite operators feared that allowing smaller microwave antennas would increase their numbers, which they argued might cause interference to satellite earth stations. Just days before the FCC decision, FiberTower and the leading satellite opponent agreed on language to address the issue, which the FCC duly adopted. Other satellite opponents, some of whom wanted the FCC to set aside segments of the band exclusively for their own use, made no headway.

The proceeding is one more example of the FCC’s gradual relaxation of its technical requirements, which overall has helped to reduce the cost and promote the spread of telecommunications services.

Photo of Mitchell Lazarus Mitchell Lazarus

Mitchell Lazarus has 35 years’ experience representing clients at the Federal Communications Commission and other federal agencies.

Schooled in both law and electrical engineering, Lazarus specializes in the regulation of new telecommunications technologies. He has helped dozens of manufacturers and service providers win…

Mitchell Lazarus has 35 years’ experience representing clients at the Federal Communications Commission and other federal agencies.

Schooled in both law and electrical engineering, Lazarus specializes in the regulation of new telecommunications technologies. He has helped dozens of manufacturers and service providers win FCC authorizations for innovative products and services.

Read more about Mitchell LazarusEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    CommLawBlog
  • Organization:
    Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo