According to Professor David Schultz, claims of voter fraud in recent Presidential elections are based upon evidence, such as hearsay evidence, that would be inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. He writes as much in a short op-ed piece in the Op Ed News, in which he further states that his argument will be fleshed out in an upcoming law review article. It will be interesting to see how he applies the Rules to the evidence that is out there, and I’ll follow up on this after reading the article.
-CM