Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

“White Space” Saga Lurches On

By Mitchell Lazarus on October 8, 2007
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Back on August 1, we reported that the FCC had tested two portable devices intended for use in unoccupied TV “white space” channels. The proponents claimed the devices were able to detect and avoid TV signals, thereby allowing portable use while also preventing interference to TV reception. The FCC’s engineers disagreed, finding that the devices “do not consistently sense or detect TV . . . signals,” and hence are “capable of causing interference to TV broadcasting . . .”

“Hey, it worked fine for us,” the proponents retorted, in effect, and all but accused the FCC of breaking the device.

In the meantime, the FCC chairman announced that he hoped to issue a white space order soon. This raised consternation in an industry already on edge. If based on the current test results, such an order would presumably have to disfavor portable white space devices.

Last Friday, the FCC lab announced it would test additional devices, if people wanted to send any in. No word yet on takers, or how the additional testing would affect the FCC’s decision schedule. But the lab is busy these days, and testing would probably take several weeks.

The public notice on new testing is at this link.

An unrelated development concerns fixed (non-portable) unlicensed use of the white space frequencies, long thought to be headed for easy approval. FiberTower Corporation and the Rural Telecommunications Group, Inc. have submitted a white paper urging that fixed use be licensed on an exclusive basis, either by auction or by charging fees. Their filing is at this link.

Photo of Mitchell Lazarus Mitchell Lazarus

Mitchell Lazarus has 35 years’ experience representing clients at the Federal Communications Commission and other federal agencies.

Schooled in both law and electrical engineering, Lazarus specializes in the regulation of new telecommunications technologies. He has helped dozens of manufacturers and service providers win…

Mitchell Lazarus has 35 years’ experience representing clients at the Federal Communications Commission and other federal agencies.

Schooled in both law and electrical engineering, Lazarus specializes in the regulation of new telecommunications technologies. He has helped dozens of manufacturers and service providers win FCC authorizations for innovative products and services.

Read more about Mitchell LazarusEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    CommLawBlog
  • Organization:
    Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo