Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Supreme Court Declines Reconsideration of Kelo Issues

By David Snyder on July 14, 2008
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to revisit its controversial decision in Kelo v. City of New London. In Goldstein v. Pataki, property owners challenged the project in Brooklyn known as the Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Project. The properties were condemned for a new basketball arena for the New Jersey Nets as well as high rise apartments and office buildings.

The challengers to the project argued that the purpose of the project was improper and raise some of the issues that were raised by the Kelo decision and the response to the Kelo decision. The justices, without comment, refused to hear the argument that the seizure of their property would violate the United States Constitution. Justice Alito, however, noted that he wanted to hear the case.
This was one of the first opportunities for the United States Supreme Court to address many of the issues that were raised by Kelo and its backlash. However, the Supreme Court – which as two new justices since the Kelo decision – decline to consider these issues in this context.

  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    Eminent Domain and Real Estate Valuation
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo