Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

DTV Countdown Down For the Count

By Anne Goodwin Crump on March 4, 2009
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

100-day countdown requirement waived temporarily

What a difference a couple of weeks make! Remember a week or two ago, when the FCC came out with new orders and proposals changing the DTV consumer education rules that had been in place for a year?  And remember how the new approach included the requirement that stations which had chosen DTV consumer education Option Two (the NAB plan) would have to re-start their 100-Day Countdown calendars as of March 4? The night before that requirement was to kick in, the Commission changed course again.

On March 3, the FCC waived the new-and-improved 100-Day Countdown requirement pending resolution of the February 20 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). So scratch that new 100-Day Countdown, at least for the time being.

The Commission is concerned – and properly so – about potential viewer confusion. The proposals currently under consideration contemplate a gradual DTV roll-out between April and June, meaning that some stations will be transitioning in advance of the new June 12 national transition date. That being the case, the FCC is trying to figure out what kind of count-down makes sense: one tied to the broadcasting station’s own particular transition schedule, one tied to the national deadline, or possibly some combination of the two, or maybe even some other alternative that includes the transition schedules of other stations as well.

That question, and others raised in the NPRM, are expected to be addressed no later than March 13. At that point the FCC will give us all instructions as to how to proceed. Until then, though, the 100-Day Countdown requirement has been waived.

In announcing the waiver, the FCC stressed that all other DTV consumer education requirements aside from the countdown remain in place in the meantime,.  Therefore, stations must continue to air their PSA’s and crawls; they just don’t have to add countdown announcements as yet. In fact, any station that has started such announcements should stop at once.

Photo of Anne Goodwin Crump Anne Goodwin Crump

Mrs. Crump has represented both commercial and non-commercial clients in a variety of transactional and regulatory matters. These have included guiding clients through the purchase and sale of broadcast stations, assisting with the license renewal process, and advising on the DTV and repack…

Mrs. Crump has represented both commercial and non-commercial clients in a variety of transactional and regulatory matters. These have included guiding clients through the purchase and sale of broadcast stations, assisting with the license renewal process, and advising on the DTV and repack transition processes. She also has assisted clients with day-to-day regulatory matters, including political broadcasting, children’s television matters, EEO reports and audits, and helps clients develop strategies for meeting their goals while complying with FCC rules.

Mrs. Crump has filed comments on behalf of clients in a variety of FCC rulemaking proceedings, which have included both broad policy issues, such as ownership regulations and broadcast localism, and station-specific matters, such as non-routine changes in community of license. She also has engaged in written advocacy for clients, whether arising from contested transactions or FM translator interference issues, or other matters.

Read more about Anne Goodwin CrumpEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Communications, Media & Entertainment
  • Blog:
    CommLawBlog
  • Organization:
    Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo