Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The $175,000 Question: When Is A Computer Circuit Card Not A Computer Circuit Card?

By Peter Tannenwald on April 16, 2009
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Answer: When the FCC says it’s a TV.

The FCC has hit up a manufacturer of personal computer TV tuner cards for a $175,000 forfeiture. Why? Because the manufacturer marketed cards that have only analog and not digital tuning capability.  The Notice of Apparent Liability was issued by the full Commission, as opposed to, say, the Enforcement Bureau – a clear sign that the full FCC is still in full-tilt enforcement mode with respect to the marketing of non-compliant TV receivers. (It has been in that mode for at least a couple of years, as we have previously reported here and here, for example.)

Of course, all new TV sets must have both analog and digital tuners.  That requirement, first imposed in 2002, was phased in based on screen size. Since March 1, 2007, all TV receivers imported into or shipped or marketed within the U.S. must include DTV capability.  The rule also applies to all kinds of receiving equipment, including VCRs (who remembers VCRs?) and other devices that lack their own screen and have to plugged into the back of a TV set or other display device.

The PC card manufacturer ran through a whole host of reasonable arguments for why a computer card should not be deemed subject to the rule. It argued that consumers should have a choice of what they want to buy; and in any case, a PC card is just a computer peripheral, not a TV, and is different from a VCR in that the output can’t be plugged into the back of a TV set.  No way, the FCC said.  TV is going digital, and we are not going to tolerate anything, with or without a screen, that is used to receive and display over-the-air TV signals unless it can work with digital signals.

But even the Commission, hard-nosed though it may be, had to acknowledge that, as violations go, selling cheap PC tuner cards with no screen attached is “not as egregious” as selling, like, real TVs (“television receivers with an associated viewing screen”). So rather than lower the maximum boom ($97,500 per violation) onto the manufacturer, the Commission figured it would cushion the blow by charging a mere $25,000 per violation. But what might initially have looked like a mild spanking got ugly when the Commission decided that a separate “violation” occurred with each model marketed. Since the manufacturer had sold seven different PC card models, the bottomline line turned into a considerably heftier $175,000 – not exactly pocket change.

It took me only about five minutes on the Web today to find some analog-only PC cards still for sale.  At least one catalog displayed the consumer alert that was used before digital tuners were universally required, but that alert no longer protects the vendor.  I wonder if the FCC is also browsing the Web.

Photo of Peter Tannenwald Peter Tannenwald

Peter Tannenwald joined Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC, as a Member, after a 40-year career which included one of Washington’s 10 largest law firms, where he was a partner, and more recently as a named principal of Irwin, Campbell & Tannenwald, P.C. In…

Peter Tannenwald joined Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC, as a Member, after a 40-year career which included one of Washington’s 10 largest law firms, where he was a partner, and more recently as a named principal of Irwin, Campbell & Tannenwald, P.C. In addition to a broad range of radio and television broadcast station groups and individual station owners and common carrier and wireless clients in both regulatory and transactional matters, he has represented inventors and developers of new technologies and has helped implement several such technologies, including wireless auditory assistance devices for persons with hearing loss, the use of AM broadcast stations for power utility load management, visual captions on television broadcasts, the Interactive Video and Data Service, compatibility of cellphones and hearing aids, and most recently combining television broadcast and broadband services in the same spectrum.

Read more about Peter TannenwaldEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Communications, Media & Entertainment
  • Blog:
    CommLawBlog
  • Organization:
    Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo