Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

E. Coli Outbreak Investigation Tries To Solve Mystery By Turning Focus To Nestle Flour Supplier

By Dan Flynn on June 30, 2009
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Nestle USA’s flour supplier for its Danville, VA cookie dough plant is now the focus of a joint investigation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

The name of the flour supplier was not made available.

FDA found the E. coli O157:H7 bacteria in samples of the prepackaged Nestle Tool House refrigerated cookie dough, but inspections inside the Danville plant found no traces on equipment or workers.

As result, FDA is turning to individual ingredients beginning with the flour in hopes of finding out how a deadly bacterium from the intestines of cattle came to be found in raw cookie dough.

The contaminated Nestle cookie dough is now blamed for infecting 72 people in 30 states with a strain of E. coli O157:H7 with a common DNA fingerprint. Fifty-one have been confirmed by advanced testing and additional confirmatory tests results are pending on the others.

The E. coli outbreak forced Nestle to recall an estimated 300,000 cases of the popular Toll House cookie dough, or 3.6 million individual packages.

The victims range in age from 2 to 65 years old. Most (71 percent) are female, and 65 percent are under 19 years of age. While no deaths have yet been attributed to the outbreak, 34 have been hospitalized and ten have developed the often life-threatening hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS).

The number of infections is also continuing to rise.

Food safety attorney Bill Marler, managing partner of the Seattle law firm of Marler Clark, is urging Nestle to immediately begin paying the medical bills and lost wage claims of all legitimate victims of the outbreak. Marler has already sued Nestle on behave of victims in Colorado, California and Washington State.

“True, it will not completely prevent Nestle from being sued to both uncover why the outbreak happened and to deal with the suffering of the victims and the need for possible future medical expenses that might well include life time monitoring, kidney dialysis and transplant, but it certainly will not hurt, “ says Marler. 

Photo of Dan Flynn Dan Flynn

Dan Flynn is a Denver-based writer and editor with more than ten years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a journalist included working…

Dan Flynn is a Denver-based writer and editor with more than ten years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a journalist included working for newspapers throughout the West, from the Black Hills to Seattle. His on-scene reporting on the collapse of the Idaho’s Teton Dam and the suicide bombing at Washington State University’s Perham Hall was carried by newspapers around the world and was recognized both times regionally by the Associated Press for Best Reporting on a Deadline. Most of the disasters he attends these days involve food illnesses.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Food Poison Journal
  • Organization:
    Marler Clark, Inc., PS
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo