Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The Outcome of the EC Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry

By Inside EU Life Sciences on September 3, 2009
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Article originally published in Concurrences, N° 3-2009 (September 2009)

PROCEED WITH CAUTION ACROSS THE IP/COMPETITION INTERSECTION

DG Competition’s release of its long-awaited Final Report on its Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry on 8 July 2009 was somewhat of a damp squib compared to the fireworks surrounding the publication of its Interim Report some eight months earlier. The release of the Interim Report in November 2008 was a Brussels media event, with press briefings, press releases, and an all-day public hearing that was covered by the Commission’s live television channel. The Interim Report elicited vociferous criticism from the pharmaceutical industry. Innovative pharmaceutical companies – or “originator ” companies to use the Report’s terminology – were concerned that practices that they deemed to be critical to the protection of their patents were being called into question. These concerns were set out in detail in the numerous submissions that were made to DG Competition after the publication of the Interim Report.

Read the complete article here

  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade, Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Inside EU Life Sciences
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo