Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Is Act 312 Applicable to My Operation?

By Victor Suane on April 26, 2010
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In 2006, the Louisiana Legislature enacted Louisiana Revised Statute 30:29 (“Act 312”) to provide a procedure for judicial resolution of claims for environmental damage to property. The provisions of Act 312 are applicable whenever there is “any litigation or pleading making a judicial demand arising from or alleging environmental damage” involving “contamination resulting from activities associated with oilfield sites or exploration and production (“E&P”) sites,” regardless of whether claims for remediation arise under the Louisiana Mineral Code or Civil Code. La. R.S. 30:29(I)(1).

Though the constitutionality of Act 312 was upheld by the Louisiana Supreme Court in M.J. Farms, Ltd. V. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371 (La. 2008), 998 So.2d 16, there may be some uncertainty as to which types of oil and gas activities fall under the purview of Act 312. Specifically, under Act 312, environmental damage is defined as any actual or potential impact, damage, or injury to environmental media caused by contamination resulting from activities associated with oilfield sites or exploration and production sites. This includes, but is not limited to, impact or injury to soil, sediment, surface water or ground water.

Act 312 defines an oilfield/E&P site as a location on which oil or gas exploration, development, or production “activities” have occurred. Such activities would include the use of wells, equipment, tanks, flowlines or impoundments in the drilling, workover, production, primary separation, disposal, transportation or storage of E&P wastes, crude oil and natural gas prior to a custody transfer or sales point.

Using generally accepted oil and gas terminology, activities occurring in the “upstream” oil and gas sector are within the procedures set forth in Act 312, while activities taking place in the “midstream” and “downstream” sectors would likely not meet the criteria set forth in Act 312. It appears that the Louisiana legislature intended Act 312 to apply only to contamination resulting from activities that occur during the search for and recovery of oil, gas and minerals from the earth and its related processing, transportation and storage prior to a transfer of custody or sale. Contamination resulting from any subsequent processing, transportation, storage, or refining activities after said transfer would likely not be covered by Act 312.

  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    Louisiana Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Kean Miller
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo