Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Proposed HITECH Regulations Require Business Associates to Police Subcontractors Receiving PHI

By Elizabeth Litten on July 9, 2010
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

 

On Thursday, July 8, 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced proposed modifications to the HIPAA Privacy & Security Rules implementing the HITECH Act.  The proposed modifications include new requirements on business associates with regard to their subcontractors.  

The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) within HHS proposes to include in the definition of “business associate” in § 160.103 subcontractors that create, receive, maintain, or transmit protected health information on behalf of a business associate. OCR specifies that it does not intend this proposed modification to mean that a covered entity is required to have a contract with the subcontractor. Rather, the “obligation is to remain with the business associate who contracts with the subcontractor.” In § 164.308(b)(2), OCR proposes “to make clear that it is the business associate that must obtain the required satisfactory assurances from the subcontractor to protect the security of electronic protected health information.”  

The proposed rule casts business associates into a much more active role, requiring them to enter into business associate agreements (BAAs) with their subcontractors. In effect, business associates would be expected to act as though they are covered entities in terms of identifying when protected health information (PHI) is transmitted to third parties and policing the privacy and security of PHI whenever it flows downstream or outside the business associate workforce.

Because a covered entity with which a business associate has contracted still has an ultimate responsibility for the privacy and security of the PHI of its patients or clients, existing BAAs may require further review and amendments to protect the covered entity sufficiently should this rule be adopted.

  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo