Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Virginia District Court Decision On Constitutionality of New Health Care Law Could Impact Pending Sixth Circuit Appeal

By amyhocevar & Squire Patton Boggs on December 13, 2010
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

A federal district judge in Virginia ruled today that the new health care law’s mandate requiring individuals to purchase health insurance is unconstitutional, becoming the first court in the country to invalidate any part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010. See Virginia v. Sebelius  (E.D Va., Case No. 3:10CV188-HEH) (PDF).

Judge Henry E. Hudson wrote that the law’s requirement that most Americans obtain health insurance exceeds the regulatory authority granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Judge Hudson wrote that his survey of case law “yielded no reported decisions from any federal appellate courts extending the Commerce Clause or General Welfare Clause to encompass regulation of a person’s decision not to purchase a product, not withstanding its effect on interstate commerce or role in a global regulatory scheme.”

This decision is in contrast to decisions from the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and from the Western District of Virginia, in which both courts upheld the constitutionality of the mandate requiring individuals to purchase health insurance.  See Thomas More Law Center, et al. v. Obama (E.D. Mich., Case No. 10-CV-11156) (PDF) and Liberty University v. Geithner (W.D. Va., Case No. 6:10-CV-00015) (PDF). These decisions are currently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Fourth Circuit respectively. This Virginia case may leapfrog those appeals, however, if the Justice Department agrees to the Virginia attorney general’s request to bypass the Court of Appeals and file for expedited review by the Supreme Court.

  • Posted in:
    Appellate, Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    Sixth Circuit Appellate Blog
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo