Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New Rules on Making Deferred Compensation Subject to Signing a Release

By Melissa Ostrower & Bruce H. Schwartz on January 4, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

IRS Notice 2010-6 previously provided guidance concerning how to make payment of nonqualified deferred compensation that is subject to the signing of a release complaint with Section 409A. 

Essentially, it provides that a plan may not allow an employee to delay or accelerate the timing of a payment as a result of the employee’s actions (such as signing a release), provided, however, that if the plan provides for payment (subject to the employee’s action) within a designated period following the permissible payment event under Section 409A, the plan must provide for payment only on the last day of such designated period.

If the plan does not provide for payment (subject to the employee’s action) within a designated period following the permissible payment event under Section 409A, the plan must provide for payment only upon a fixed date either 60 or 90 days following the occurrence of the permissible payment event. Notice 2010-80 modifies this guidance by providing an additional method to make the payment of deferred compensation contingent upon an employee’s actions, such as signing a release, compliant with Section 409A (and an additional method to correct certain document failures involving payments contingent upon an employee’s actions). Under this additional method, a plan may provide for payment during a specified period not longer than 90 days following a permissible payment event, provided that if the period begins in one year and ends in the subsequent year, the payment must be made in the subsequent year.

With respect to correcting plans to comply with this guidance in Notice 2010-80, Notice 2010-80 contains significant transition relief concerning the date by which plans must be amended. This is a general summary of the modified procedure. Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer your questions about the Section 409A correction procedures.

Photo of Melissa Ostrower Melissa Ostrower

Melissa Ostrower is a principal in the New York City, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. and co-leader of the firm’s Employee Benefits practice group. She counsels clients in a broad range of employee benefit matters, including general compliance and administration of…

Melissa Ostrower is a principal in the New York City, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. and co-leader of the firm’s Employee Benefits practice group. She counsels clients in a broad range of employee benefit matters, including general compliance and administration of qualified retirement plans and nonqualified retirement plans.

Melissa assists clients with welfare plan issues involving cafeteria plans, health plans, flexible spending accounts, COBRA and the Affordable Care Act. She regularly speaks on all benefits issues including federal health care reform, fiduciary compliance and executive compensation.

Melissa regularly advises on executive compensation matters, including issues related to compliance with Section 409A, 162(m) and 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.

Melissa represents clients in connection with Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor audits and information requests. She also regularly assists clients in fixing plan operational and document errors. Melissa negotiates with benefits providers, volume submitter and prototype vendors, TPAs, insurers and auditors.

Melissa also advises clients in connection with phantom and equity based compensation arrangements.

Read more about Melissa OstrowerEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Benefits Law Advisor
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo