Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Entergy Says Joining MISO Will Save Customers Over $1 Billion

By Linda Evers on April 26, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Yesterday, Entergy announced plans to join the Midwest Independent System Operator (MISO). The New Orleans based utility had been evaluating its options regarding the best management structure for its transmission system, including proposals from the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) and MISO. The study done by Entergy included independent analysis of the savings and actual proposals from SPP and MISO on how certain costs would be shared. This evaluation summary shows that joining MISO could save customers more than $1 billion in power production costs for the 2013 to 2022 timeframe. While both MISO and SPP were assumed to have a Day 2 market, an advantage of joining MISO is that it has an operating Day 2 market today:

The analysis clearly shows there are compelling benefits to joining a regional transmission organization with substantial scale and a Day 2 market,” said J. Wayne Leonard, Entergy’s chairman and chief executive officer. He added, “An organized market design based upon centralized auction markets creates greater efficiencies than one that relies upon bilateral trading, particularly in electricity markets where some congestion is always present. We look forward to discussing in detail the benefits of joining MISO with regulators, their staffs and other stakeholders in the months ahead. As the analysis showed, MISO’s substantial scale and established market made it the clear choice for customer benefits.
Entergy Press Release, April 25, 2011

Given the anticipated departure of FirstEnergy and Duke Ohio, this decision by Entergy must have MISO execs doing the Second Line in Carmel. According to MISO’s news release, the integration of Entergy will create the largest RTO in the US. MISO is presenting to two half-day seminars on May 18 and 19, 2011, for those interested in meeting its leadership and learning more about the organization, its markets and its processes, including optional tours of its Carmel, IN control room. Given the concern about grid security, I question the appropriateness of an open invitation to view MISO’s control room. Hopefully the registration process is designed to carefully screen those allowed to tour the control room, although the invitation appears to be to any interested party.

Now that Entergy has made its decision, how hot will the battle between MISO and SPP over capacity sharing get? Initially, MISO requested expedited treatment to facilitate a decision by Entergy. Several parties opposed special treatment. FERC issued a notice stating that protests and motions are due May 9, 2011.


Update
: We were recently contacted by a representative from MISO regarding the control room concerns who provided the following information:
“In response to your posting on the 26th entitled “Entergy Says Joining MISO Will Save Customers Over $1 Billion” regarding an “open invitation to view MISO’s control room,” I’d like to provide clarity on this matter. While the MISO informational seminars those days are open, tours of the Control Room are subject to the company’s Tour Policy and Security requirements. Tours are conducted from the Overlook, not the control room floor, and are granted on a case-by-case basis with attendees being notified by MISO whether a Control Room tour has been approved. No power marketers are allowed to tour MISO’s operations.” – MISO Representative, May 11, 2011
I thank MISO for this update.
  • Posted in:
    Energy and Utilities
  • Blog:
    Smart Grid Legal News
  • Organization:
    Stevens & Lee P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo