Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The “Final” 2011 Legislative Update (Unless It’s Not Final) …

By Husch Blackwell on July 20, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Somewhat to our surprise, at the end of the First Called Session (more commonly known as the special session), the legislature added some guardianship provisions from H.B. 2900(that failed to pass in the Regular Session) to S.B. 1, the “fiscal matters” bill that was the primary reason for the special session in the first place. 

One of these provisions deals with the transfer of a guardianship from one county to another.  Following the transfer, the bond must be modified to reflect the new court, and there must be a hearing within 90 days to determine whether any terms of the original guardianship should be modified. 

The other deals with problems arising from guardianship proceedings in more than one state.  If a foreign guardian desires to transfer the guardianship to Texas, the application should include certified copies of all papers filed in the foreign proceeding, and the Texas court must determine whether any terms of the original guardianship should be modified. 

A Texas court may delay further action in a guardianship proceeding if a subsequent proceeding is filed in another jurisdiction where venue is proper.  The preference of a proposed ward who is 12 years of age or older becomes a factor for the court’s consideration. 

If at any time the Texas court determines that it has acquired jurisdiction because of unjustifiable conduct, the court may: 

  1. decline to exercise jurisdiction;
  2. impose an appropriate remedy for the health, safety, and welfare of property or prevent a repetition of the unjustifiable conduct; or
  3. continue to exercise jurisdiction after considering whether all parties have acquiesced to jurisdiction, whether Texas is a more appropriate forum, and whether the other court would have jurisdiction.

If the Texas court determines that it has jurisdiction because of unjustifiable conduct, the court may assess costs against the party engaging in that conduct.

(Please don’t ask me to explain the relevance of these provisions to a “fiscal matters” bill.)

S.B. 1 was signed by the Governor July 19thand is effective September 28th.

We’ve posted an updated legislative update (dated July 19th) that reflects the changes included in S.B. 1.  You’ll find it in the usual place.

  • Posted in:
    Trusts, Estates and Elder
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Law Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo