Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

SEC Possibly Blows Stanford Receiver Oversight

By Fox Rothschild on September 28, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In yet another investigation being conducted by the SEC’s Inspector General, the conduct of SEC officials in overseeing the Stanford Receiver has come into question.

Although the Stanford ponzi scheme resulted in multibillion dollar losses, the Stanford Receiver apparently has recovered only approximately $120,000,000.  However, according to a variety of reports, the Receiver has spent over $118,000,000 for his attorneys and himself.  The Inspector General’s investigation appears to be focused in on the SEC’s lack of oversight of the Receiver’s fees and expenses given the time spent on this matter.

The Receiver’s counsel has claimed that the Inspector General has not contacted the Receiver to discuss this particular issue, and has stated that the Receiver paid out a total of nearly $100,000,000 to investors.  Further, the Receiver’s counsel claimed that only $47,000,000 was paid for necessary expenses to wind down Stanford’s operations.

This situation does not bode well for the public’s view of the SEC. The SEC seems to be, once again, “asleep at the switch,” and not properly supervising those that serve as its fiduciaries.

  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Securities Compliance Sentinel
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo