A group of jewelry retailers, manufacturers and suppliers entered into a Proposition 65 settlement agreement with Center for Environmental Health (CEH) several months ago concerning cadmium in jewelry. The settlement was formalized in a consent judgment approved by Alameda Superior Court in CEH v. Aeropostale, Inc

As in other Prop 65 consent judgments, this settlement contained a provision that allows other companies to join the settlement by agreeing to “opt-in.” A company can “opt-in” if it has received a Notice of Violation from CEH, or if it has not received any notice but wants to be subject to the terms of the consent judgment and be protected from other lawsuits regarding this chemical. 

For companies that have already received a notice regarding cadmium in jewelry from CEH, joining the settlement as an opt-in may be an efficient way to resolve the pending Proposition 65 action. It does require a company to pay the settlement amount of $55,000 and agree to the injunctive relief terms of the consent judgment. Joining the opt-in is a less attractive option for companies that haven’t received any Notice of Violation regarding cadmium in jewelry.  

The deadline for opting-in is Friday, October 21, 2011.  If you are concerned about potential cadmium in jewelry that your company manufactures, imports or sells in California, you should talk to an attorney to get more information about the opt-in. Stoel Rives is here to help with your Proposition 65 needs. 

Photo of Melissa A. Jones Melissa A. Jones

Melissa A. Jones is a trial lawyer who provides experienced and practical counsel in complex business disputes, appellate matters and internal investigations. She has represented clients from a broad range of industries in complex civil litigation matters in both state and federal court…

Melissa A. Jones is a trial lawyer who provides experienced and practical counsel in complex business disputes, appellate matters and internal investigations. She has represented clients from a broad range of industries in complex civil litigation matters in both state and federal court, including the agribusiness, and oil and gas industries. Her practice includes an emphasis on Proposition 65 defense as well.

Melissa’s experience includes litigating claims for breach of contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, misappropriation of trade secrets, products liability, false advertising and unfair competition. Melissa has helped clients at every stage of litigation and has argued key motions and appeals, including several arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Melissa also regularly defends companies in litigation claims related to California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (Proposition 65) and Unfair Competition Law (17200) and advises companies on Prop 65 compliance.

Click here for Melissa Jones’s full bio.