Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Constitutionality Of Delaware Court Of Chancery’s Arbitration Rules Challenged

By Sheldon Rennie on October 27, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Delaware Coalition for Open Government, Inc., filed a lawsuit yesterday against the Delaware Court of Chancery and the individual members of its bench.  Click here for an article relating to this litigation.  The suit challenges the constitutionality of the 2009 enactment of 10 Del. C. § 349 and accompanying Court of Chancery Rules 96 through 98 that allow for an expedited private arbitration proceeding once certain prerequisites are met.  The lawsuit claims that the arbitration proceedings employed under the statute and rules and utilized by the Delaware Court of Chancery violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.  Thus, it will be interesting to see how both sides analyze and apply the various nuances of those Amendments.  We will keep a close eye on this proceeding particularly because the enactment of these rules has been touted to increase efficiencies in the litigation of complex commercial cases in Delaware.

  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Delaware Chancery Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo