Privacy class action litigation is hot in California and a new wave of lawsuits are being filed under California’s 2003 “Shine the Light” law, codified in Cal. Civ. Code Section 1798.83.

This privacy law affects most businesses with as few as 20 employees and allows individuals to learn about how a business sells and shares their personal information.  Companies that do business with California residents must either allow their customers an opportunity to opt out (without charge) of having their information shared, or the company must make a detailed disclosure of how personal information was shared in the past calendar year for direct marketing purposes.  For businesses without a storefront operation, there may be additional requirements for disclosing the business’s privacy policy, including a detailed posting on its website.

Personal information is broadly defined and includes:

  • Name and address
  • Email address
  • Age or date of birth
  • Names of children
  • Email or other addresses of children
  • Number of children
  • The age or gender of children
  • Height
  • Weight
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Occupation
  • Telephone number
  • Education
  • Political party affiliation
  • Medical condition
  • Drugs, therapies, or medical products or equipment used
  • The kind of product the customer purchased, leased, or rented
  • Real property purchased, leased, or rented
  • The kind of service provided
  • Social security number
  • Bank account number
  • Credit card number
  • Debit card number
  • Bank or investment account, debit card, or credit card balance
  • Payment history
  • Information pertaining to the customer’s creditworthiness, assets, income, or liabilities

Once per calendar year, a consumer has the right to request and receive within 30 days of the request, information about (1) how the consumer can exercise opt-in or opt-out rights or (2) the type of personal information shared for direct marketing purpose and with whom it was shared.

Violations of the Shine the Light law are hefty as civil penalties are available under Cal. Civil Code Section 1798.84 and they range between $500 and $3,000 per violation, plus attorneys’ fees and costs.  Businesses may have a 90-day safe harbor to correct an untimely or inaccurate notification.  Since damages are so difficult to prove in privacy lawsuits, plaintiff attorneys are looking to laws with statutory damages in place (such as Song-Beverly, the Video Privacy Protection Act, and the Confidential Medical Information Act).  It is no surprise that plaintiff attorneys are trolling websites to see if businesses are displaying an appropriate privacy policy.  If the business is not, a putative class action lawsuit will likely be filed seeking millions, or even billions, of dollars in statutory penalties without proof of actual damages.  If a review of your privacy policies was not on your list of 2012 New Year’s resolutions, it should be quickly added.

Photo of Theodore J. Kobus III Theodore J. Kobus III

Ted Kobus stands at the forefront of cyber protection — no small role in an era defined by crippling data breaches and daily digital threats. He has earned authority in the areas of privacy, data security and cybersecurity, leading clients to entrust him…

Ted Kobus stands at the forefront of cyber protection — no small role in an era defined by crippling data breaches and daily digital threats. He has earned authority in the areas of privacy, data security and cybersecurity, leading clients to entrust him with more than 6,000 data breach responses. Businesses, government and other organizations turn to Ted for sound advice on compliance, developing response strategies, breaches implicating domestic and international laws, and defense of both class action litigation and regulatory actions. Notably, he has developed key relationships with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), where he and his team have helped to establish protocols to protect corporate victims following a data breach. He knows the most proactive regulators involved in this space and interacts with them regularly.

Ted has led the defense to hundreds of regulatory investigations, including those brought by the Attorney General Multi-State, Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, Departments of Insurance, SEC and FTC. In the healthcare space, Ted has defended more than 200 OCR investigations and has negotiated more privacy/security-related resolution agreements than any other lawyer.

Ted is consistently ranked in Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business, and he is one of only a handful of attorneys nationwide named an MVP by Law360 for Privacy and Consumer Protection. He is a regular contributor to BakerHostetler’s Data Counsel blog, and he frequently speaks at major industry events regarding data breach response, risk management and litigation issues affecting privacy. Ted has spoken at the National Association of Attorneys General on data security issues in a closed session, as well as the National Security Cyber Specialist’s Training Conference organized by the DOJ.

Ted is the firmwide chair of BakerHostetler’s Digital Assets and Data Management Group and a member of the firm’s Policy Committee.