Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Certiorari Appeal Timeline Is A Trap For The Unwary

By Richard Gallogly on January 27, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In an “unpublished” decision in the case of Carney v. Town of Framingham (pdf) (further appellate review denied), a panel of the Appeals Court ruled that the statutory 60-day period for filing a certiorari appeal starts on the date the administrative agency takes its “last administrative action” – in this case a vote – not when the agency later reduces its decision to writing.

M.G.L. c. 249, § 4 provides that a certiorari petition must be filed within 60 days after the “proceeding complained of.”  In Carney, the Appeals Court panel noted that this term refers to the “last administrative action” taken by the agency.  On June 4, 2008, the Framingham Conservation Commission voted to amend a previously issued enforcement order.  The amended order issued on June 6, 2008.  On August 5, 2008 – 60 days after the written order, but 62 days after the commission’s vote – the plaintiff filed its certiorari appeal in Superior Court.  The court granted the town’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the appeal was untimely, holding that it was the commission’s vote – not its written decision two days later – that was the commission’s “last administrative action” triggering the statutory appeal period.

This decision, which was issued pursuant to the Appeals Court’s Rule 1:28 (pdf), and therefore is of limited precedential value, has particular relevance to wetland orders of conditions issued under local by-laws.  Frequently, conservation commissions will issue a written decision days or weeks after voting on a matter.  Interested parties should monitor agency proceedings closely, and be sure that they appeal within 60 days of the board’s “last administrative action” – which may very well be its vote.

Photo of Richard Gallogly Richard Gallogly

Rich Gallogly’s practice focuses on zoning and real estate development, from site acquisition to permitting, financing and development on behalf of clients throughout Massachusetts. For over 28 years, he has advised clients on all aspects of land use law, including zoning, subdivision, wetlands…

Rich Gallogly’s practice focuses on zoning and real estate development, from site acquisition to permitting, financing and development on behalf of clients throughout Massachusetts. For over 28 years, he has advised clients on all aspects of land use law, including zoning, subdivision, wetlands, historic preservation and environmental impact review and regulatory compliance.

Read more about Richard GalloglyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Massachusetts Land Use Monitor
  • Organization:
    Rackemann, Sawyer & Brewster
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo