Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

One-third Procedures Test

By Diane T. Carter on February 20, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Outpatient Surgery Magazine recently published an article describing a case in New Jersey in which an ASC successfully defended an action brought by three physicians who were forced to sell their ownership interests in the ASC due to the physicians’ failure to meet the “one-third procedures test” under the applicable federal anti-kickback statute safe harbor.  The physicians had previously signed the ASC’s operating agreement in which they agreed to comply with the one-third/one-third tests.  However, they failed to do so and refused to sell their units.  So, the ASC sold their units for them (for a hefty profit) in order to bring the ASC into compliance with the safe harbor.  The physicians sued the ASC alleging violation of the state’s securities laws, but the ASC prevailed. See the full article.

Photo of Diane T. Carter Diane T. Carter

Diane, a member of the firm’s Executive Board, has passionately served the healthcare industry for a quarter-century. Diane advises clients on strategic planning, corporate matters, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, restructuring, transactional, regulatory and compliance matters.

Read more about Diane T. CarterEmail
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Law Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo