Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

North American Leaders Discuss Possible Expansion of the TPP Talks

By Jonathan T. Stoel on April 4, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Reuters+US+Obama+N+American+Leaders+Summit+3Apr12+480[1]

President Obama met with the heads of state of Canada and Mexico on Tuesday, April 3 at the North American Leaders’ Summit.  Canadian Prime Minister Harper and Mexican President Calderon used the Summit as an opportunity to express their frustration with President Obama that the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has not yet permitted Canada and Mexico to enter the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a wide-ranging free trade agreement covering the Asia-Pacific region, and to escalate pressure on the U.S.  Both countries recently have asked the United States (and the other eight TPP countries) to grant them entry into the talks – an outcome that, combined with the possible inclusion of Japan – would expand the TPP to cover 40 percent of global GDP.  Although the President and USTR Ron Kirk agreed with their Canadian and Mexican counterparts that the TPP provides an opportunity to deepen trade relations even further and to address unemployment, the United States has not yet committed publicly to Canada or Mexico as to their admission to the talks.

The possible expansion of the TPP is an important trade issue facing the Obama Administration in an election year. The TPP negotiations have progressed over the past three years, but the negotiating parties have identified several key issues that are unlikely to be resolved in 2012. USTR thus far has been reluctant, however, to expedite the admittance of new countries and has instead sought to advance the negotiations as far as possible before election year politics force the talks to grind to an effective halt.

Photo of Jonathan T. Stoel Jonathan T. Stoel

Partner, Washington, D.C.

Multinational companies facing international trade and other complex international disputes look for specific experience in the courtroom and in arbitration. So do investors enmeshed in investment disputes. Jonathan Stoel has the experience to support clients in these challenging circumstances.

A…

Partner, Washington, D.C.

Multinational companies facing international trade and other complex international disputes look for specific experience in the courtroom and in arbitration. So do investors enmeshed in investment disputes. Jonathan Stoel has the experience to support clients in these challenging circumstances.

A partner in the firm’s International Trade and Investment and International Arbitration practices, Jonathan handles complex matters involving treaty-based claims, international investment protections, public international law, and international trade and customs issues. He also provides guidance on the U.S. Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

Jonathan helps clients in many industries, including the steel, pharmaceutical, energy, agriculture, and consumer products sectors. He represents claimant investors in investment arbitrations before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and its additional facility, as well as in ad hoc arbitration under the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Jonathan also develops strategies for clients to avoid protracted and costly investment dispute settlement proceedings.

Jonathan regularly represents companies in international trade administrative proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC). He also litigates appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Court of International Trade. Jonathan has resolved international trade disputes through arbitration before panels constituted pursuant to the World Trade Organization (WTO), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). Jonathan provides customs law guidance to clients on classification, valuation, tariff preference, and other issues. He has first-chaired client defenses in customs regulatory audits, prior disclosures, and penalty and forfeiture proceedings.

Jonathan also serves as the chair of the Board of Trustees of the Thurgood Marshall Academy, a Southeast Washington charter school, and as counsel to the Court-appointed Receiver for Options Public Charter School.

Read more about Jonathan T. StoelEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo