Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Preservation and Cost Shifting: Recent New York Appeals Court Opinions Clarify State Discovery Rules

By Gilbert S. Keteltas on April 23, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The New York state Appeals Court has been active in the e-discovery space over the past few months.  In Voom HD Holdings LLC v. EchoStar Satellite LLC the court discusses when the duty to preserve information in advance of actual litigation arises.  And in U.S. Bank N.A. v. GreenPoint Mtge. Funding, Inc., the court considers who should bear the cost of electronic discovery.

For a deeper analysis of these two cases, please see a recent article published in the State Bar of Texas Corporate Counsel Section Spring 2012 Newsletter (“An E-Discovery “Twofer”: Recent New York Appeals Court Opinions Clarify State Discovery Rules”).

Photo of Gilbert S. Keteltas Gilbert S. Keteltas
Read more about Gilbert S. KeteltasEmailGil's Linkedin ProfileGil's Twitter Profile
  • Posted in:
    E-Discovery
  • Blog:
    Discovery Advocate
  • Organization:
    Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo