Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FDA’s Changing Culture: What Food Companies Need to Know

By Joe Levitt on June 13, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is undergoing a major culture change, and nowhere is that impact being felt more than in the food industry.  While visibly preparing new regulations to implement the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), the agency has quietly become much more inspection-oriented and enforcement-minded, even under its historic authorities.  Here is what food companies need to know and what to do about it.

Inspections

The FDA “cop on the beat” is back.  The agency is conducting more factory inspections than in recent years, and is being more strategic in its deployment.  FDA targets particular industries, and sometimes particular companies.  While still nominally based on risk, FDA’s definition of “high risk” has expanded so much that it covers 1/3 of the food industry.

The demeanor of FDA inspections has changed as well.  Inspectors are much more assertive, often insisting on access to records and asserting their “right” to take photographs, always sensitive issues.  And their inspections are more thorough. 

In particular, FDA has switched from collecting just product samples (which rarely test positive) to conducting extensive environmental testing – what some have dubbed a “swab-a-thon” – which is much more likely to find positives.  The inspector’s list of observations (Form 483) is consistently longer and more detailed.

Enforcement

With more inspections comes more enforcement.  FDA is now routinely issuing Warning Letters based on insanitary conditions and violations of good manufacturing practices (GMPs), something unheard of a decade ago. 

Companies which receive Warning Letters will now face steep reinspection fees under FSMA, and companies that fail that reinspection become candidates for an injunction action, twelve of which FDA has brought in the past 15 months.

FDA has also threatened to resurrect usage of the Park doctrine, based on a 1976 Supreme Court case affirming FDA’s right to bring a criminal misdemeanor case against corporate executives based on a strict liability theory.

What does this mean for food companies?  Go back to basics:

  • Refocus attention in your facilities to basic sanitation and adherence to GMPs.
  • Be ready for an FDA (or state) inspection at any time.
  • Know your rights and responsibilities during an FDA inspection, including records access and photography.
  • Update your internal inspection manual and retrain your staff to address the new generation of FDA inspectors.
  • Implement timely corrective actions to all FDA inspectional observations – do not let matters escalate!

As the saying goes, “being forewarned is forearmed.”

Photo of Joe Levitt Joe Levitt

Partner, Washington, D.C.

As the FDA’s former top food regulator, Joe Levitt brings a true insider’s knowledge to helping food industry clients deal effectively with the FDA. Whether influencing policy making or confronting a threatened compliance action, Joe’s 25 years of FDA experience…

Partner, Washington, D.C.

As the FDA’s former top food regulator, Joe Levitt brings a true insider’s knowledge to helping food industry clients deal effectively with the FDA. Whether influencing policy making or confronting a threatened compliance action, Joe’s 25 years of FDA experience puts clients in the best position to succeed.  In the private sector, Joe was on the ground floor when Congress developed the landmark FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). Joe was also a leading voice for the food industry when the FDA developed regulations that all food companies must now follow. No one can help navigate the labyrinth of FDA’s FSMA regulations better than Joe and his team, and no one can better put your company in the driver’s seat when the FDA inspector knocks on your door for your first FSMA inspection.

Joe adeptly handles high visibility recalls and compliance actions. If a company finds itself in trouble with the FDA, they need someone with a deep insider’s understanding of what works and what doesn’t. Joe knows what the agency expects in the compliance arena, and the bar clients will be expected to meet. He can communicate his client’s position calmly and effectively to the FDA so the matter gets put behind them. His record of “helping startups and multinational companies… survive Food and Drug Administration investigations and avoid import bans that could shutter the companies,” led to Joe being named a Law360 Food & Beverage MVP (2016).

Joe is among the most decorated officials in FDA history, with his achievements being recognized by multiple U.S. presidents, cabinet secretaries, and FDA Commissioners. He maintains close working relationships with senior FDA officials and has served as the Board Chair of the FDA Alumni Association.

Read more about Joe LevittEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo